It has become very silent around the historic court case in the Netherlands against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer), former Dutch PM Mark Rutte, media and health ministers. There is simply no news to be found about the progress of this case, while we are already waiting for months for the decision of the High Court of the Netherlands.

This decision would determine whether the district court needs to hear expert witness testimony from Dr Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer VP), Sasha Latypova (former Pharma executive and researcher), Katherine Watt (international law expert and legal analyst), Catherine Austin Fitts (financial analyst and former US government official), and Dr Joseph Sansone (clinical psychologist) in a preliminary pre-trial evidence hearing ahead of the main civil case.

Every one of these experts shows another side of the covid plandemic, being the greatest crime against humanity.

Each testimony is worth your attention, as it shows the hidden truths and agenda’s of the elite.

Each testimony can contribute to the change of our world. That’s how important they are.

I already shared the testimonies of Sasha Latypova (former Pharma executive and researcher), Michael Yeadon and Katherine Watt with you. You can read and watch them here:

Today I would like to share the testimony of Catherine Austin Fitts with you.
Catherine Austin Fitts is an American investment banker and former public official who served during the Presidency of George Bush, as United States Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing.

Fitts has been a whistleblower on several large-scale instances of government fraud. In a 2004 study published in World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, she reported to have found “evidence that a very large proportion of the nation’s wealth is being illegally diverted since several decades into secret, unaccountable channels and programmes with unspecified purposes, including covert operations and subversions abroad and clandestine military R&D at home. Public institutions have been infiltrated and taken over by shadowy groups in the service of powerful private and vested interests, often at the expense of the common good.”

In 2017 Fitts co-authored a report, that claimed to have found $21 trillion in “unauthorized spending” by the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development over a 17-year period.

Fitts featured in the 2020 film Planet Lockdown, to warn the world about the Plandemic and its intended lockdown measures. She has given interviews in alternate media, such as kla.tv, alleging fraud in the US central banking system and US government (”21 trillion dollars have been stolen”) and “massive fraud” in the 2020 election and Electoral fraud in US elections for many years before 2020.

Catherine Fitts gives us an expert testimony, based on her financial perspective and knowledge. It might be difficult to understand at some points, but I do urge you to read or listen to it, as what she tells us is very important. I have taken the freedom to change some words or sentences to make it easier for you to read.

Her point of view fills a gap. In other words, it completes the picture of ‘world control’ from the financial side. She shows us how the ‘Going Direct Reset’ was the financial motivator for the plandemic.

She shows the cause and consequences of this Going Direct Reset, something we all experience in our daily lives.

I start by giving you the transcript of her statement, followed by the video itself. Here we go:

Catherine Austin Fitts:

“I would like to thank the District Court of Northern Netherlands for the opportunity to address you. My name is Catherine Austin Fitts and I am the publisher of the Solari Report and I am the former partner and member of the board of Dillon Read, an investment bank on Wall Street and the former assistant secretary of housing in the first Bush administration.

I wish to give this statement because I believe that the pandemic represented an egregious misuse of health care policies to implement economic and political agendas. And I would like to explain the history and background as to why I am convinced that that is so.

I am an expert on the United States federal credit and the federal budget and financial mechanisms. I have a great deal of information about that at my website, including on $21 trillion that’s gone missing from the federal government. You can find that at missingmoney.soleri.com.

“Starting in 1998, I became very concerned about a change of policy in the federal government, whereby billions and then trillions of dollars was going missing from federal accounts. It started in October 1st 1997, which is the beginning of federal fiscal 1998. Between that time and 911, there was approximately $4 trillion missing from the federal government. In fact, the day before 911, the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference and said that the Department of Defense was missing 2.3 trillion and this was a terrible problem.

Money continued to go missing from then on and as of fiscal 2015 there was 21 trillion missing. I had been tracking the missing money between fiscal 1998 and 2015 and then started speaking about it publicly.

A professor from Michigan State University, Dr. Mark Skidmore heard me and contacted me. He thought it was unbelievable that this was so, but checked out the federal financial statements. All these numbers are from the financial statements.

He proceeded with his students to do a survey and that survey brought tremendous pressure on the government to obey the financial management laws, particularly the laws requiring audited financial statements. Between fiscal 1998 and 2015 the federal government had refused to obey the laws related or requiring audited financial statements.

As that pressure put more pressure under the federal government to obey. So what happened was a policy which was adopted in 2018, called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement 56, which essentially was an administrative policy that took the position that they could authorize secret books by the federal government. We’ve had essentially no meaningful financial disclosure in my opinion since.

It was at that point that I realized (as I had realized all the way along), one of the reasons that I continued to try and publicize and tell people about the missing money and encourage reforms around the missing money is, I said:

“And in fact, that had started to happen.

In the spring of 1997, I was meeting with a a leadership of some of the top pension funds who were on one of my advisory boards at my company in Washington, called Hamilton Securities Group.

I made a presentation to them about how we could re-engineer federal finances in a way that would bring tremendous new wealth to the country and make it possible for the pensions to afford the retirements, promised to the boomer generation. Essentially, the boomer generation was a a financial pig going through the snake. And the question was, how would we generate enough returns on the pension funds to make it?

One leader, when I presented my plans on how we could re-engineer federal spending so that we stopped running huge deficits, (the head of the largest pension fund in the country, CalPERS), said to me, “You don’t understand. It’s too late. They’ve given up on the country. They are moving all the money out starting in the fall.”

And I thought he meant we’re reallocating the investments in the pension funds to the emerging markets, because the growth rate is bigger. That’s not what he meant. He meant no, we’re we’re going to start moving huge amounts out through the back door of the federal government with the 21 trillion that went missing by 2015.

And in fact, if you look at the budget deal, where I believe that decision was made in 1995, when he said they have given up on the country, there was a huge effort by the leadership of the financial system to get the budget on a balanced budget. When they failed, literally the next month, a series of policies were put in place that started to lower life expectancy in the lower income groups. And that continued.

If you look at any chart of life expectancy in the United States versus the other industrialized nations, the top 19 industrial nations other than the US are steadily rising in terms of life expectancy. And starting at that point in 1997, you start to see the United States drop and start to diverge from the other countries.

 

‘And then when the pandemic hits, it falls off the chart.’

 

“And I remember sitting in my car. I was running errands in Tennessee and talking to Dr. Skidmore, after our efforts to get real reforms done. And Dr. Skidmore said, “Why don’t you just give up? Why do you keep bringing this up?” And I said, “Mark, don’t you understand? If we don’t do something here, they’re going to have to lower life expectancy much more than they’re doing now. They’re going to have to lower life expectancy in the middle class.”

And so when the pandemic happened, I was not surprised, in the summer of 2019 every year the central bankers meet in Jackson Hole, the G7 central bankers and have various policy discussions. And in 2019, the year after FASAB statement 56 was adopted, the central bankers met in Jackson Hole and they reviewed a plan from the Black Rock Investment Institute, prepared by a group of retired central bankers, called the Going Direct Reset.

Now we know that the central banking system, every 80 to 120 years does a reset. And often that reset is done when you evolve the currency or you move the currency to a different currency. You know, at some point you sort of flush the system.

“And so, I assumed when that happened that we were going into a new reset, the Going Direct Reset.

Going direct refers to a radical change in policy. Traditionally, when a Central Bank like the Federal Reserve, added money to the system, it would add it by investing in, or putting money into the reserve track and then the banks would use that reserve track to then put money in the system.

Going direct was the Fed essentially injecting enormous amounts of money directly without going through reserve track, but buying among other things securities from the non-depository institutions.

And what happened starting that September after the going direct meeting, the Federal Reserve with interventions in the market in September, (but then with the announcement of the pandemic) injected extraordinary amounts of money into the system.

Different estimates are that was 5 trillion or 6 trillion dollars invested or injected directly. Normally any injection like that would have extraordinary inflationary impact. And in fact there was one former under secretary of the treasury, who, speaking with Swiss investors said: ‘You know enormous inflation is baked into the cake. We just won’t feel it right away’.

And the reason we won’t feel it right away, as it turns out, was the pandemic.

Many of the pandemic sort of actions of locking people down or calling certain businesses ‘not essential’ and leaving other businesses open, created an enormous deflationary offset.

If you look at what happened in the United States, we basically shut down Main Street. Lots of small businesses left the publicly traded companies open and shifted enormous market shares out of the small businesses into the big businesses, thus radically consolidating enormous amounts of economic activity.

So you inject 5 trillion (essentially grossly oversimplified) into Wall Street and you shut down Main Street and then Wall Street has money to go shopping and Main Street is in an economic squeeze there.

The last estimates I saw, estimated that 35% of the small businesses in America were shut down. In some places I think San Francisco was as much as 49%. So it was very very successful at consolidating economic activity into the big players.

One estimate was we in the United States, we created 500 (or maybe it was worldwide) we created 500 new billionaires.

“So as I said, looking at this from the viewpoint of what was happening financially around the world, it was pretty clear to me that much of the pandemic was essentially designed to implement the reset and using health policy as an excuse.

“I had been an investment adviser for 10 years and because of that, I had dealt with many clients who’d experienced vaccine injury or neurological damage from vaccines, but also various pharmaceuticals. So I was very concerned about whether or not the vaccine was safe and effective.

We now have many studies proving that it wasn’t. That doesn’t surprise me. We have enormous increases in excess death and a continued drop in in lowering life expectancy, including in the middle class. So it certainly fits with what I expected.

What I would say is that when a society allows this much public policy and health care policy to be created, based on other economic and political goals, and does so with terrible lies and propaganda and misinformation, that’s not a society that can endure.

 

“If we’re going to have a civilization based on the rule of law, these kinds of egregious lies used by oligarchs and billionaires to engineer central control, using these techniques including things which are very very harmful to people’s health, can absolutely not be tolerated.

And so I would just ask the courts to look at this case and look at the misuse of both misinformation and disinformation to make cases as to what was appropriate from a medical or scientific standpoint, that clearly wasn’t in a way that did terrible terrible harm to people throughout Europe and the United States.

And I would encourage you to take a very serious look at this, because if you look at what was happening economically and politically, it is clear to me that what we’re looking at is a re-engineering of how our governments work and how our societies work, in a way that is not in any of our interests.

Certainly what we want and what we need is the rule of law and we depend on the courts to give that to us. So, I would ask that you give this case very serious consideration. And again, I thank you for the opportunity to address you today. And I thank you for your willingness to look at this case.

 

Please watch her testimony here:

Thank you Catherine, for being a hero for so many years. You have exposed so many evil agenda’s due to your feelings of rightfulness, your insight and knowledge. It takes courage to stand up and speak out.

I hope your voice will be heard and justice will prevail.

Thank you for following my work. Please consider upgrading to paid, to support me bringing out these truths into the world.

My next post will contain a gift to my paid subscribers, as a huge ‘thank you’ for their support. Please upgrade to profit from that as well.

With love, as always, Cyntha
www.fallcabal.com/donate
www.fallcabal.com/shop

A deep dive into the Okoro et al. WHO data bombshell, the Rancourt mortality analyses, Christine Cotton’s devastating biostatistical autopsy of the clinical trials, the War Room/ DailyClout Pfizer document revelations, and the Michels et al. forensic death analysis — plus how hospital protocols, not the virus, drove the death toll.

Individually, each of these studies presents a vital part of the jigsaw. In combination, the conclusions become all the more devastating.

 

The Study That Should Have Been Page One Everywhere

In April 2025, a paper landed in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine that should have triggered emergency congressional hearings, front-page headlines, and a complete re-evaluation of every public health decision made since late 2020. Instead, it was memory-holed with the efficiency we’ve all come to expect.

Okoro, Ikoba, and colleagues did something almost too obvious to be radical: they simply compared COVID-19 deaths in the pre-vaccine period against the vaccination period —using the WHO’s own data— and asked what happened.

Here’s what happened:

• Africa: 43.3% increase in COVID deaths with vaccination

• Eastern Mediterranean: 350.9% increase

• South-East Asia: 403.7% increase

• Europe: 496.5% increase

• Americas: 705.9% increase

• Western Pacific: 1,275.0% increase

Let that sit for a moment. The Western Pacific region —Australia, Japan, South Korea, countries with advanced healthcare systems and very high vaccination uptake— saw COVID deaths multiply by nearly 13-fold after the vaccines were deployed.

The study’s authors call this finding “paradoxical,” which is polite academic-speak for “the exact opposite of what we were promised.”

The regions with the lowest vaccination rates —Africa at 3.8% of global cumulative deaths pre-vaccines, the Western Pacific at 1.5%— were essentially untouched by COVID mortality before the shots arrived. Meanwhile, the Americas and Europe, with their aggressive vaccination campaigns, accounted for over 70% of global COVID deaths despite their high vaccination coverage.

This isn’t a paradox. It’s a pattern. And patterns demand explanations………..